Vibe-to-Production · production readiness review
Production-readiness review for AI-built apps
Before real users, payments, sensitive data or an engineering handover, get a senior-led written view of what to fix, what can wait and what needs specialist input.
NDA available before any code sharing. Review scope and access are agreed first.
Built with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Replit, v0 or another AI tool? We review the product and its critical flows—not the tool that generated the first version.
Prototype-to-production proof
BijouHair: a Lovable prototype became a live BLIK booking flow in two weeks
A founder had a polished booking site, but Calendly accepted only EUR while Polish clients expected BLIK. We reviewed the codebase, designed the integration, and connected the existing frontend to Supabase, Edge Functions and Stripe BLIK.
What this case proves
We can take an AI-built frontend through a concrete production blocker: backend design, payment orchestration, end-to-end testing and deployment.
Read the BijouHair case studyThe review scope
The decisions that matter before you raise the stakes
We agree the critical flows and review depth first. The emphasis is on evidence around the parts of the product that will face customers, money, sensitive data or a new engineering team.
Architecture & ownership
Boundaries, data flows, dependencies and the parts of the codebase your team needs to understand and maintain.
Critical flows
The journeys that create value or risk: sign-in, permissions, payments, integrations and sensitive-data handling.
Security & secrets
Practical review of authentication, authorisation, exposed secrets and common application-security risks within the agreed scope.
Testing & change safety
What protects the essential flows today, where coverage is missing and what makes future changes safer.
Delivery & recovery
Deployment path, environments, failure modes and the operational assumptions that need validating before launch.
Observability & open risks
What the team can see when the product runs, what will be hard to diagnose and which questions need product, security or legal owners.
What you receive
A written decision tool—not a vague development conversation
The result is a prioritised view of the risks and next actions for the agreed scope, so you can decide whether to ship, harden or bring in a specialist.
- A prioritised findings summary tied to the reviewed flows
- Evidence and context for the most important risks
- A clear fix, defer or validate-next recommendation for each priority
- A phased remediation sequence your team can own or ask us to implement
- Documented open questions for product, security or legal owners
Scope boundary. This is an engineering production-readiness review. It is not a penetration test, a certification or legal advice; specialist work is separately scoped where needed.
How it works
Review first. Choose hardening second.
The diagnostic stands on its own. If you want help afterwards, implementation is a separate, visible choice—not a surprise extension of the review.
- 01
Set the scope and access
We agree the product context, critical flows, available code and environment access, confidentiality needs and the right review depth.
- 02
Review findings together
You receive the written findings and a prioritisation workshop. We explain the evidence, trade-offs and the recommended next sequence.
- 03
Choose the next move
Take the roadmap to your team, validate a specialist need, or ask us to scope optional hardening work with visible milestones and handover.
A good fit when your AI-built app is about to matter
- You are preparing for real users, payments, integrations or sensitive data
- A founder or product team needs an independent engineering view before a bigger commitment
- You need to hand an AI-built codebase to an internal or new delivery team
- The product works, but changes now feel risky or difficult to explain
Not the right starting point for a brand-new idea without a working product, or for a formal certification or legal determination. We will say so before asking for repository access.
We're part of your product team — not a vendor you manage
Senior engineers who bring ideas to the table, challenge assumptions, and treat your product decisions as their own. Expect architectural opinions, direct pushback when we see a better path, and genuine ownership of outcomes — not just deliverables.
You'll talk directly with the engineers building your product from the first scoping call through to deployment. No relay layers, no handoff friction — just a team that's invested in your success.
Ideas, not just execution
We suggest approaches you haven't considered and flag decisions we'd make differently.
Accountable to outcomes
We measure success by your product working, not by tickets closed.
Your independence is the goal
We document and hand over clearly. We build teams that don't need us to stay.
Also explore
Other ways Awakast can support your product.
AI Product Development
Agentic AI systems built end-to-end — from architecture to production deployment.
Learn more →MVPAI MVP Delivery
From brief to production-ready product in 6–8 weeks with a senior team.
Learn more →Applied AIApplied AI & ML
Pragmatic AI and machine learning delivery from discovery to production-ready integration.
Learn more →Full-StackFull-Stack Development
Pragmatic modern applications using proven components. Fast to market, easy to maintain.
Learn more →Make the next production decision with evidence
Tell us what the app does, what is about to change and where it currently feels risky. We will recommend the right review scope before requesting repository access.